We’ve all seen what generative AI can do. You type a prompt, and seconds later, you have a photorealistic image, a block of Python code, or a marketing email. It feels like magic.
Naturally, this has sparked a massive question in our industry: Can AI already generate accurate, production-ready engineering drawings?
If you are a mechanical engineer, you probably already suspect the answer. Not yet.
While tools like Gemini's AI image generator and photo editor, nano banana, are impressive, there is a fundamental difference between generating a picture of a gearbox and engineering a functional one.
Here is the reality of AI for mechanical engineers right now, where it fails, where it shines, and why the "Copilot" approach is the only one that makes sense for manufacturing.
The "Hallucination" Problem: A Glitch in Art is Style; A Glitch in CAD is a Lawsuit
The biggest hurdle for AI for CAD is the nature of Large Language Models (LLMs) and image generators. They work by approximation and probability, not physics. They are excellent at making things look real, but they don't understand how things work.
In the world of art, if an AI adds an extra finger to a hand, it’s a funny meme In mechanical engineering, if an AI hallucinates a tolerance or misplaces a mounting hole by 2mm, it’s a manufacturing disaster.
AI for mechanical engineers faces a barrier that other industries don't: Physics and Liability.
- Zero Tolerance for Error: A generative model might approximate a curve. Engineering requires exact GD&T.
- System Blindness: AI creates isolated visuals. It doesn't yet understand how Part A stresses Part B under thermal load.
- The Legal Reality: An engineering drawing isn't just a guide; it’s a binding legal document containing compliance data, material specs, and revision history. AI isn't ready to sign off on that.
Stop Trying to Replace the Designer. Start Enhancing the Engineer.
So, if AI can't draw the part for you, is it useless? Far from it.
The industry is looking at this the wrong way. The value isn't in asking AI to create from scratch; the value is asking AI to check what you created.
This is where the concept of the AI Copilot takes over, and where tools like bananaz are finding their stride.
Instead of asking, "Draw me a piston," smart teams are saying, "Here is a piston I designed. Tell me if it’s manufacturable."
This is where AI actually works today:
- Instant Analysis: It can scan complex CAD files faster than any human.
- Error Detection: It flags missing tolerances or impossible geometries before they hit the shop floor.
- Validation: It acts as a safety net, enforcing engineering rules, custom company rules and best practices.
The Verdict
Will we eventually see physics-aware models that can generate entire assemblies from a text prompt? Probably. But that technology requires a fusion of generative AI and rigorous simulation that is still years away.
For now, the most powerful AI for CAD isn’t a tool that does your job for you, it’s a tool that ensures you didn't miss anything.
By using platforms like bananaz to validate and analyze, engineering teams get the best of both worlds: the speed of AI and the safety of human engineering rigor.
.png)
